Wednesday, September 09, 2026

Loss of control in flight: Beechcraft A36 Bonanza, N566C, fatal accident occurred on March 14, 2025, near Greenville-Pitt Airport (PGV/KPGV), Greenville, North Carolina

  • Location: Greenville, North Carolina
  • Accident Number: ERA25FA143
  • Date & Time: March 14, 2025, 07:49 Local
  • Registration: N566C
  • Aircraft: RAYTHEON AIRCRAFT COMPANY A36
  • Aircraft Damage: Destroyed
  • Defining Event: Loss of control in flight
  • Injuries: 2 Fatal
  • Flight Conducted Under: Part 91: General aviation - Personal

https://data.ntsb.gov/carol-repgen/api/Aviation/ReportMain/GenerateNewestReport/199855/pdf

https://data.ntsb.gov/Docket?ProjectID=199855

On March 14, 2025, at 0749 eastern daylight time, a Raytheon Aircraft Company A36, N566C, was destroyed when it was involved in an accident in Greenville, North Carolina. The private pilot and the passenger were fatally injured. The airplane was operated as a Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 personal flight.

The instrument-rated private pilot and passenger were departing on an instrument flight rules (IFR) flight. The weather conditions that preceded and persisted until the time of the takeoff consisted of low ceilings (300 ft), mist, and fog with instrument meteorological conditions (IMC) through most of the area. After departure, the pilot flew the runway heading and climbed briefly before turning right and descending to about 200 ft. The right turn then stopped and the airplane flew a relatively straight ground track and resumed the climb. While flying at an altitude of about 600 ft, with the airplane climbing at a vertical speed of about 1,800 feet per minute, the airplane continued for about a mile before entering another turn to the right. The airplane stopped climbing during this turn after it reached a peak altitude of 1,000 ft. Shortly after, the right turn progressively tightened as the airplane began a descending spiral. A witness observed the airplane rolling as it descended out of the clouds before impacting terrain.

The airplane impacted the terrain at high-speed in a nearly 50° nose down, and steep right wing low attitude. Postaccident examination of the wreckage was limited by the level of impactrelated damage and significant fragmentation. Within the wreckage that was examined, there was no indication of a preimpact mechanical malfunction or failure that would have precluded normal operation of the airframe or engine. Additionally, witness statements and impact signatures observed on the airplane’s propeller blades were consistent with the engine producing power at impact. 

The instrument-rated pilot had completed an instrument proficiency check about 2 months before the accident. Since then, he had accumulated additional experience that included flight in simulated and actual instrument meteorological conditions, and had conducted several instrument approaches, all in the accident airplane. While his flight logs suggested that he had some familiarity operating the airplane and its newly installed electronic flight instrumentation under instrument flight rules, the pilot’s overall level of proficiency could not be determined from available information. The airplane’s erratic flight track on the accident flight, which included arrested climbs, descents, and low altitude turns that culminated in a tightening turn and high-speed descent was indicative of the known effects of spatial disorientation, specifically the somatogyral illusion (graveyard spiral). During the initial climb, once the pilot entered the clouds and lost all outside visual cues, it would have been difficult to recognize and respond to spatial disorientation unless he was confident and assertive in his use of the airplane’s avionics package and flight instrumentation. 

The aortic plaque observed a postaccident autopsy of the pilot indicated some increased risk of an impairing or incapacitating cardiovascular event, although the magnitude of this risk was uncertain from the limited autopsy evidence. The limited qualitative toxicology results in tissue indicated that the pilot had used the sedating antihistamine medication diphenhydramine, but did not indicate the precise timing of his last use or whether he was experiencing associated impairing effects at the time of the accident. While the pilot had defective color vision, he had been approved for flight and there was no evidence to suggest that color vision played a role in the accident.

- Probable Cause: The pilot’s loss of airplane control shortly after climbing into instrument meteorological conditions due to spatial disorientation (somatogyral illusion).

VFR encounter with IMC: Piper PA-28-180 Cherokee C, N903US, fatal accident occurred on July 31, 2024, near Irene, South Dakota

  • Location: Irene, South Dakota 
  • Accident Number: CEN24FA295 
  • Date & Time: July 31, 2024, 07:20 Local 
  • Registration: N903US Aircraft: Piper PA-28-180 
  • Aircraft Damage: Destroyed 
  • Defining Event: VFR encounter with IMC 
  • Injuries: 1 Fatal 
  • Flight Conducted Under: Part 91: General aviation - Personal

https://data.ntsb.gov/carol-repgen/api/Aviation/ReportMain/GenerateNewestReport/194815/pdf

https://data.ntsb.gov/Docket?ProjectID=194815

On July 31, 2024, about 0720 central daylight time, a Piper PA-28-180 airplane, N903US, was destroyed when it was involved in an accident near Irene, South Dakota. The pilot was fatally injured. The airplane was operated as a Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 personal flight.

The non-instrument-rated pilot departed from an airport where visual meteorological weather conditions prevailed. As the flight progressed, the visibility and ceilings decreased. Flight track data showed that, during the flight, the airplane began a steady descent that continued to the end of the data. The airplane struck trees and terrain, and a postimpact fire ensued which destroyed the airplane. 

Examination of the airplane did not reveal any preimpact anomalies that would have precluded normal operations. The individual who found the accident site reported that he was driving on the adjacent road and saw the glow of a fire through dense fog, which led him to discover the accident site. 

The destination airport, about 13 nautical miles (nm) from the accident site, reported instrument flight rules weather conditions for several hours before the airplane’s departure. There was no evidence that the pilot obtained a weather briefing before the flight, and weather sources that he may have accessed before the flight were not known. 

The pilot had coronary artery disease that was associated with increased risk of an impairing or incapacitating cardiovascular event, such as chest pain, arrhythmia, or heart attack. There was no autopsy evidence that such an event occurred, although such an event cannot be excluded by autopsy evidence alone.

Based on the available evidence, it is most likely that the pilot continued flight into deteriorating weather conditions, and due to the low visibility, was unable to detect a descent and remain clear of trees and terrain. The damage to the airplane and witness marks at the accident site are consistent with controlled flight into trees and terrain.

- Probable Cause: The pilot’s poor decision to continue the flight into deteriorating weather conditions and his failure to maintain a safe altitude, which resulted in controlled flight into trees and terrain. 

Fuel starvation: Piper PA-28-140 Cherokee Cruiser, N1039X, fatal accident occurred on June 10, 2024, near Clinton, Michigan

  • Location: Clinton, Michigan 
  • Accident Number: CEN24FA215 
  • Date & Time: June 10, 2024, 13:11 Local 
  • Registration: N1039X 
  • Aircraft: Piper PA28 
  • Aircraft Damage: Substantial 
  • Defining Event: Fuel starvation 
  • Injuries: 1 Fatal, 1 Serious 
  • Flight Conducted Under: Part 91: General aviation - Instructional

https://data.ntsb.gov/carol-repgen/api/Aviation/ReportMain/GenerateNewestReport/194430/pdf

https://data.ntsb.gov/Docket?ProjectID=194430

On June 10, 2024, about 1311 eastern daylight time, a Piper PA-28-140 airplane, N1039X, was substantially damaged when it was involved in an accident near Clinton, Michigan. The flight instructor was fatally injured, and the student pilot sustained serious injury. The airplane was operated as a Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 instructional flight.

The flight instructor and student pilot were conducting an instructional flight in the singleengine airplane. ADS-B data and an NTSB performance study showed that, after completing training maneuvers south of the departure airport, there was a possible reduction in engine power. The flight instructor contacted air traffic control to return to the airport, but did not report any difficulties. Shortly after, the airplane was on a heading toward the airport in a descent consistent with the best glide prescribed by the airplane manufacturer’s Pilot’s Operating Manual. The airplane then turned about 270° to the left toward a local road and field, consistent with the pilots maneuvering for a forced landing. While about 200 ft above ground level (agl) and at an airspeed higher than the wings-level, flaps-retracted stall speed, the airplane began a right turn away from the road. The wreckage and impact signatures, including initial right wingtip contact followed by nose impact, were consistent with a loss of airplane control while maneuvering at a low altitude during the forced landing.

Postaccident examination of the airframe and engine revealed no evidence of any preimpact mechanical malfunctions or failures that would have precluded normal operation. The examination also showed that the right fuel tank was intact and there was no evidence of blighting or moistened soil beneath the right wing at the accident site that would indicate fuel leaking from the wing tank. The left fuel tank was intact and contained some amount of usable fuel after the accident. In addition, the left fuel cap was secure and intact, and no water was detected in the fuel. The fuel selector handle and valve were found between the Left Tank and Off positions, which would have prevented fuel flow. The entire fuel system forward of the fuel selector contained either no or trace amounts of fuel.

Fuel records and the airplane’s flight history indicated that the airplane had been fueled to 36 gallons (18 gallons per fuel tank) two days before the accident flight. Only one 1.2-hour flight  was completed after the airplane was refueled and before the accident flight. At an estimated fuel consumption of 7.6 gallons per hour (gph) and assuming the fuel was evenly distributed between the tanks, this would have resulted in 27 total gallons for the accident flight when it departed the airport (13.5 gallons per fuel tank). Fuel calculations suggest that the engine was operated between 60 and 75% power during the accident flight, consistent with a fuel consumption rate between 6.8 and 8.4 gph. Assuming the flight departed with evenly distributed fuel tanks, this fuel consumption for the 1.7-hour accident flight is consistent with the airplane having been operated on one fuel tank for the entire accident flight was completed after the airplane was refueled and before the accident flight. At an estimated fuel consumption of 7.6 gallons per hour (gph) and assuming the fuel was evenly distributed between the tanks, this would have resulted in 27 total gallons for the accident flight when it departed the airport (13.5 gallons per fuel tank). Fuel calculations suggest that the engine was operated between 60 and 75% power during the accident flight, consistent with a fuel consumption rate between 6.8 and 8.4 gph. Assuming the flight departed with evenly distributed fuel tanks, this fuel consumption for the 1.7-hour accident flight is consistent with the airplane having been operated on one fuel tank for the entire accident flight.

The lack of fuel in the downstream fuel system components, the fuel selector valve’s as-found position, the remaining usable fuel in the left tank, and the lack of evidence of fuel leakage or contamination were consistent with a total loss of engine power due to fuel starvation. It is likely that, after the selected fuel tank was depleted, the fuel selector was inadvertently moved past the Left Tank detent toward the Off position during an attempt to restore engine power, which prevented fuel in the left tank from reaching the engine. The fuel selector was located on the left side of the cockpit, next to the student pilot’s left leg. The student pilot did not recall the flight or accident sequence. Therefore, the investigation could not determine when the fuel selector was moved or which occupant moved it.

The flight instructor’s autopsy findings revealed some evidence of heart disease that increased the risk of an impairing or incapacitating cardiac event; however, there was no autopsy evidence that such an event occurred. Toxicology results also indicated that the flight instructor had used a cannabis product. The measured levels of delta-9-THC and its metabolites indicated a possibility that, at the time of the accident, the instructor pilot may have been experiencing acute psychoactive effects of cannabis. However, delta-9-THC levels as high as those found in this case may persist well beyond the time window of acute psychoactive effects in frequent cannabis users. Whether the pilot was a frequent cannabis user is unknown. Accordingly, the toxicology results alone do not establish whether the pilot was experiencing significant cannabis-related cognitive or psychomotor impairment at the time of the accident or during preflight preparations. 

A long-lived non-psychoactive metabolite of delta-9-THC was detected in the student pilot’s blood, indicating that he likely had used a cannabis product sometime in the days before the accident. FAA testing did not detect delta-9-THC or psychoactive metabolites of delta-9-THC in his blood collected about 1.7 hours after the accident. These toxicology results provide no specific evidence that the student pilot was experiencing impairing cannabis effects at the time of the accident or during preflight preparations. 

Therefore, the available evidence was insufficient to determine whether impairment contributed to the accident.

- Probable Cause: The flight instructor’s failure to maintain airplane control while maneuvering for a forced landing. Contributing to the accident was the student pilot’s or flight instructor’s inadvertent positioning of the fuel selector valve between the Left Tank and Off positions, which resulted in fuel starvation and a total loss of engine power. Also contributing to the accident was the flight instructor’s inadequate fuel monitoring.

Aerodynamic stall/spin: Cessna 172F Skyhawk, N7905U, fatal accident occurred on August 6, 2024, at Eagle Air Park (2TE0), Brazoria, Texas

  • Location: Brazoria, Texas 
  • Accident Number: CEN24FA305 
  • Date & Time: August 6, 2024, 18:20 Local 
  • Registration: N7905U 
  • Aircraft: Cessna 172F 
  • Aircraft Damage: Substantial 
  • Defining Event: Aerodynamic stall/spin 
  • Injuries: 1 Fatal 
  • Flight Conducted Under: Part 91: General aviation - Personal

https://data.ntsb.gov/carol-repgen/api/Aviation/ReportMain/GenerateNewestReport/194863/pdf

https://data.ntsb.gov/Docket?ProjectID=194863

On August 6, 2024, about 1820 central daylight time, a Cessna 172F airplane, N7905U, sustained substantial damage when it was involved in an accident near Brazoria, Texas. The pilot sustained fatal injuries. The airplane was operated as a Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations part 91 personal flight.

The intent of the flight was to reposition the airplane to another airport. Multiple witnesses reported that the airplane taxied from its hangar to the departure end of the turf runway which was wet from recent rains. During the taxi, intermittent engine backfires were heard. The airplane taxied into position and began its takeoff roll. Witnesses heard the engine backfire again and saw the airplane come to a complete stop about 300 ft down the runway. After a few minutes, the engine rpm increased again, and the airplane started another takeoff roll. One witness observed the airplane pitch up abruptly at a high angle and climb to about 200 ft, enter an aerodynamic stall, and impact terrain.

Postaccident examination of the accident site revealed that the airplane’s takeoff roll tire tracks were observed veering to the left about 50 ft off the runway. The tracks went through tall, uncut grass that was bordering the runway, and the ground under the tall grass was boggy and water saturated. Separated small pieces of the horizontal stabilizer were found in the tall grass, and a portion of the right elevator was embedded in the top of a barbed wire fence that bordered the boggy area. The airplane impacted the terrain in a left wing down, nose low attitude about 200 ft from the fence.

Postaccident examination of the airframe and engine revealed no mechanical anomalies that would have precluded normal operation.The pilot’s most recent medical certification had been issued via Special Issuance due to medical history including coronary artery disease with a stent. The pilot’s autopsy identified a coronary artery stent, moderate coronary and cerebral artery plaque, and severe aortic plaque. The pilot’s medical condition increased his risk of cardiovascular-related impairment. Although such impairment cannot be excluded by autopsy evidence alone, no specific evidence of such impairment was identified.

- Probable Cause: The pilot’s failure to attain adequate airspeed for takeoff, which led to the airplane exceeding its critical angle-of-attack and an aerodynamic stall. Contributing to the accident was the pilot’s failure to abort the takeoff after not maintaining directional control during the takeoff roll.

VFR encounter with IMC: Taylorcraft BC-12D, N95744, fatal accident occurred on May 17, 2024, near Nondalton, Alaska

  • Location: Nondalton, Alaska 
  • Accident Number: ANC24FA032 
  • Date & Time: May 17, 2024, 11:45 Local 
  • Registration: N95744 
  • Aircraft: Taylorcraft BC12-D 
  • Aircraft Damage: Substantial 
  • Defining Event: VFR encounter with IMC 
  • Injuries: 2 Fatal 
  • Flight Conducted Under: Part 91: General aviation - Personal 

https://data.ntsb.gov/carol-repgen/api/Aviation/ReportMain/GenerateNewestReport/194279/pdf

https://data.ntsb.gov/Docket?ProjectID=194279

On May 17, 2024, about 1145 Alaska daylight time, a wheel-equipped Taylorcraft BC12-D airplane, N95744, was substantially damaged when it was involved in an accident near Nondalton, Alaska. The non-certificated pilot and a passenger were fatally injured. The airplane was operated as a Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 personal flight.

A non-certificated pilot and his passenger departed on a personal flight. About 8.5 hours later they were reported overdue and a search began. The airplane wreckage was located partially submerged in a large lake along their route of flight.

Examination of the airframe and engine revealed no evidence of any preaccident mechanical failures or malfunctions that would have precluded normal operation. Damage signatures on the propeller blades were consistent with the engine producing power at the time of impact with the water. The airplane’s lower fuselage, belly, and main landing gear sustained significant damage consistent with a high-speed collision with the water. 

Witnesses reported foggy conditions when the airplane departed. A review of meteorological data revealed that the cloud ceilings were between 300 and 400 ft above ground level with precipitation below the cloud bases at the accident site. Accordingly, the non-certificated pilot continued visual flight rules flight into instrument meteorological conditions which likely resulted in controlled flight into the lake.

Toxicological testing of the pilot revealed the presence of tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), the active compound in marijuana. The results indicate that he had used a cannabis product and may have been experiencing associated impairing psychoactive effects at the time of the crash. However, it is not possible to determine whether this affected his decision to depart into instrument conditions or whether impairment was a factor in the accident sequence itself, particularly considering that he likely did not possess the baseline skill and experience to safely conduct the flight. 

- Probable Cause: The non-certificated pilot’s continued visual flight rules flight into instrument meteorological conditions, which resulted in controlled flight into the water. 

Cessna 208B Grand Caravan EX, N247JP, accident occurred on August 9, 2026, near Lemhi County Airport (SMN/KSMN), Salmon, Idaho

  • Location: Salmon, ID 
  • Accident Number: WPR26LA302 
  • Date & Time: August 9, 2026, 14:20 Local 
  • Registration: N247JP 
  • Aircraft: Cessna 208B 
  • Injuries: 9 None 
  • Flight Conducted Under: Part 135: Air taxi & commuter - Non-scheduled
https://data.ntsb.gov/carol-repgen/api/Aviation/ReportMain/GenerateNewestReport/203572/pdf

https://registry.faa.gov/AircraftInquiry/Search/NNumberResult?nNumberTxt=N247JP

On August 9, 2026, at 1420 mountain daylight time, a Cessna 208B airplane, N247JP, was substantially damaged when it was involved in an accident near Salmon, Idaho. The pilot and eight passengers were not injured. The airplane was operated as a Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 135 on-demand air taxi flight. 

The pilot reported that, after an uneventful flight from the departure airport, he joined the downwind leg of the traffic pattern for runway 17. While turning onto the base leg, he extended the wing flaps in preparation for landing and subsequently heard a loud “pop.” Immediately thereafter, the airplane made an aggressive, uncommanded roll to the left and banked to about 45°. The pilot attempted to regain lateral control by applying right aileron. He moved the control yoke to the full right aileron position and adjusted the aileron trim to the full right setting. The airplane touched down normally, and the pilot taxied it to the ramp without further incident. 

Following the landing, a company mechanic examined the flight control systems and found substantial damage to the left wing spar. A preliminary examination identified a loose flap bolt that allowed the lower portion of the aft bellcrank to move freely. The aft bellcrank was designed to attach to the airplane with a bolt secured to an anchor nut assembly on its lower surface (see figure 1). The hardware will be retained for further examination.

Staudacher ZZ-102, N134ZZ, accident occurred on August 12, 2026, near Thrall Lake Airport (7MI3), Vicksburg, Michigan

  • Location: Vicksburg, MI 
  • Accident Number: CEN26LA285 
  • Date & Time: August 12, 2026, 19:06 Local 
  • Registration: N134ZZ 
  • Aircraft: STAUDACHER JON ZZ 102 
  • Injuries: 2 Serious 
  • Flight Conducted Under: Part 91: General aviation - Personal

https://data.ntsb.gov/carol-repgen/api/Aviation/ReportMain/GenerateNewestReport/203582/pdf

https://registry.faa.gov/AircraftInquiry/Search/NNumberResult?nNumberTxt=N134ZZ

On August 12, 2026, about 1906 eastern daylight time, a Staudacher ZZ 102 experimental airplane, N134ZZ, was substantially damaged when it was involved in an accident near Vicksburg, Michigan. The airline transport pilot and one passenger were seriously injured. The flight operated under the provisions of Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 as a personal flight. 

Preliminary information provided by law enforcement indicated the airplane departed from Thrall Lake Airport (7MI3), Vicksburg, Michigan, and climbed to about 1,500 ft when it descended and impacted terrain. Both occupants were airlifted to hospitals, and the airplane sustained substantial damage to the fuselage and both wings. 

According to the FAA aircraft records, the airplane was likely a unique build with only the accident airplane currently registered. The airplane was built in 2007 and purchased by the pilot in October 2021. According to a Barnstormers Facebook listing, dated November 8, 2025, the airplane had 210 hours total time, and the engine had 210 hours since major overhaul. 

Postaccident examination by FAA inspectors revealed the presence of fuel in both fuel tanks. However, when draining fuel from the fuel tanks, an orange substance was found in the fuel line. The airplane was retained for further examination.

Loss of control in flight: Bell 206L-4 LongRanger IV, N917SU, accident occurred on May 23, 2026, at Cedar City Airport (CDC/KCDC), Cedar City, Utah


  • Location: Cedar City, Utah
  • Accident Number: WPR26LA199
  • Date & Time: May 23, 2026, 07:21 Local
  • Registration: N917SU Aircraft: Bell 206-L4
  • Aircraft Damage: Substantial
  • Defining Event: Loss of control in flight
  • Injuries: 2 Minor
  • Flight Conducted Under: Part 91: General aviation - Instructional

https://data.ntsb.gov/carol-repgen/api/Aviation/ReportMain/GenerateNewestReport/203051/pdf

https://data.ntsb.gov/Docket?ProjectID=203051

The flight instructor, who was flying from the left seat, reported that during the initial hover, the helicopter’s engine governor reference rpm indicated about 104%. To adjust the governor reference rpm, the instructor reached across to the right-seat collective-mounted governor INCR/DECR switch. As he contacted the switch, the instructor failed to maintain helicopter control, and the helicopter pitched nose up, moved aft, and descended.

The flight crew reported that the helicopter contacted the ground, bounced, and began to spin out of control. Airport surveillance video showed the helicopter moving aft while descending before contacting the taxiway. The helicopter subsequently became airborne, rotated to the right, and impacted the ground. During the impact sequence, the tailboom and main rotor system separated from the helicopter. 

The pilot reported that there were no preaccident mechanical malfunctions or failures with the helicopter that would have precluded normal operation.

- Probable Cause: The flight instructor's failure to maintain helicopter control while manipulating the engine governor reference rpm adjustment during hover operations, which resulted in a loss of control and impact with the ground.