Monday, June 15, 2026

Collision during takeoff/land: ERCO 415-C Ercoupe, N99577, accident occurred on May 21, 2024, at Ontario Municipal Airport (ONO/KONO), Ontario, Oregon

  • Location: Ontario, Oregon 
  • Accident Number: WPR24LA158 
  • Date & Time: May 21, 2024, 12:15 Local 
  • Registration: N99577 
  • Aircraft: ENGINEERING & RESEARCH ERCOUPE 415-C 
  • Aircraft Damage: Substantial 
  • Defining Event: Collision during takeoff/land 
  • Injuries: 1 Serious
  • Flight Conducted Under: Part 91: General aviation - Personal 

https://data.ntsb.gov/carol-repgen/api/Aviation/ReportMain/GenerateNewestReport/194306/pdf

https://data.ntsb.gov/Docket?ProjectID=194306

The accident flight was the non-certificated pilot's first flight in the airplane, which the pilot had recently purchased and taken possession of on the day of the accident. The airplane was on a steep approach as the pilot attempted to land and hit an approach light short of the runway threshold. The airplane then bounced and struck another set of lights before landing hard on the runway. Subsequently, the airplane came to rest on the runway and a postimpact fire ensued. A witness who arrived at the scene of the accident stated that the pilot told him that he had misjudged the landing. 

A witness reported that the pilot conducted a steep approach to land, consistent with an unstable approach. The airplane was not available for examination following the accident, and whether a mechanical anomaly contributed to the accident could not be determined. The investigation was unable to determine the extent of the non-certificated pilot’s previous flight experience or whether the pilot had received any formal or informal flight instruction.

- Probable Cause: The non-certificated pilot’s unstable approach to landing, which resulted in a collision with approach lighting, hard landing, and postimpact fire.

- History of the Flight:

On May 21, 2024, about 1215 Pacific daylight time, an Engineering & Research Ercoupe 415-C, N99577, sustained substantial damage when it was involved in an accident near Ontario, Oregon. The pilot sustained serious injuries. The airplane was operated as a Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 personal flight. 

A certified flight instructor who was in an airplane holding short of runway 15 reported that the airplane was on a steep approach as it attempted to land and struck an approach light short of the runway threshold. The airplane then bounced and struck another set of lights before landing hard on the runway. Subsequently, the airplane came to rest on the runway, and a postimpact fire ensued. The airplane sustained substantial thermal damage to the fuselage, and the pilot sustained serious burn injuries. Another witness who arrived at the scene of the accident stated that the pilot told him that he had misjudged the landing. Subsequently, the airplane was destroyed in a postaccident fire. 

The wreckage was removed from the runway but was disposed of before the airframe and engine could be examined by the FAA or NTSB. 

The pilot was not a certificated pilot and did not hold a current FAA medical certificate, nor did he have a current medical; the FAA reported that he was denied a medical certificate about six years before the accident. 

Multiple attempts were made to contact the pilot; however, those attempts were unsuccessful while the pilot was recovering in a burn unit and under anesthesia. The pilot did not provide a statement to the FAA or NTSB after he was released from the hospital, nor did the pilot submit a National Transportation Safety Board Pilot/Operator Aircraft Accident/Incident Report Form 6120.1.

2 comments:

  1. Pilot shmilot, how hard can it be?
    (cue fireball)

    ReplyDelete
  2. Just curious. In a situation like this where the owner has "disposed" of the evidence and not replies to the NTSB, leaving them with a less than adequate investigation, will the law have a way to deal with him/ her? Or will this jerk just walk away shrugging their shoulders until they can do it all over again? Most likely citing the venerable "I want my personal freedom" diatribe.

    ReplyDelete