Saturday, June 07, 2025

Mast bumping: Robinson R44 Raven II, N144KW, fatal accident occurred on July 11, 2024, near Kekaha, Hawaii

 













https://data.ntsb.gov/carol-repgen/api/Aviation/ReportMain/GenerateNewestReport/194676/pdf

https://data.ntsb.gov/Docket?ProjectID=194676

https://registry.faa.gov/AircraftInquiry/Search/NNumberResult?nNumberTxt=N144KW

Aloha Helicopter Tours LLC dba Ali’i Air Tours

  • Location: Kekaha, Hawaii 
  • Accident Number: ANC24FA063 
  • Date & Time: July 11, 2024, 13:05 Local 
  • Registration: N144KW 
  • Aircraft: ROBINSON HELICOPTER R44 
  • Aircraft Damage: Substantial 
  • Defining Event: Mast bumping 
  • Injuries: 3 Fatal 
  • Flight Conducted Under: Part 91: General aviation - Aerial observation

On July 11, 2024, about 1305 Hawaii-Aleutian standard time, a Robinson R44 helicopter, N144KW, sustained substantial damage when it was involved in an accident near Kekaha, Hawaii. The pilot and two passengers were fatally injured. The helicopter was operated as a Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 sightseeing flight.


The helicopter was on a local air tour when the accident occurred. Witnesses reported strong, gusting wind and that a “huge” and sudden gust of wind blew over them, which was followed by a very loud “bang” noise. As their attention was drawn to the source of the loud noise, they saw the helicopter wreckage freefalling into the ocean in two sections: a main fuselage section and the tail boom section.


Examination of the wreckage revealed no evidence of any preexisting anomalies that would have precluded normal operation of the helicopter. There was evidence that a mast bumping event had occurred and that the main rotor blades had contacted the airframe, which resulted in an in-flight breakup. There was no recorded information available that could be used to determine the helicopter's airspeed, altitude, or the pilot's control inputs.


A weather study indicated that conditions were conducive to the development of strong downdraft winds. It is likely that the helicopter encountered turbulence due to downdrafts, which resulted in mast bumping and a subsequent in-flight breakup.


Robinson Safety Notice SN-32 discusses flight in high winds and turbulence and explains how improper application of control inputs in response to turbulence can increase the likelihood of a mast bumping accident. It recommends that pilots reduce airspeed below normal cruise speed to 60 to 70 knots for flight in significant turbulence. It suggests techniques to avoid overcontrol of the helicopter and says to avoid flying on the downwind side of hills and ridges.


- Probable Cause: An encounter with turbulence due to downdraft winds that resulted in mast bumping and an in-flight breakup.

Loss of engine power (total): Aeromarine Merlin Lite, N622PC, fatal accident occurred on April 2, 2024, at South Lakeland Airport (X49), Lakeland, Florida:


https://data.ntsb.gov/carol-repgen/api/Aviation/ReportMain/GenerateNewestReport/194019/pdf

https://data.ntsb.gov/Docket?ProjectID=194019

https://registry.faa.gov/AircraftInquiry/Search/NNumberResult?nNumberTxt=N622PC

  • Location: Mulberry, Florida 
  • Accident Number: ERA24FA160 
  • Date & Time: April 2, 2024, 10:38 Local 
  • Registration: N622PC 
  • Aircraft: ARTHUR B CANNING MERLIN LITE 
  • Aircraft Damage: Substantial 
  • Defining Event: Loss of engine power (total) 
  • Injuries: 1 Fatal 
  • Flight Conducted Under: Part 91: General aviation - Personal

On April 2, 2024, at 1038 eastern daylight time, an experimental amateur-built Merlin Lite motorglider, N622PC, was substantially damaged when it was involved in an accident at the South Lakeland Airport (X49), Mulberry, Florida. The private pilot sustained fatal injuries. The motorglider was operated as a Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 personal flight.


The kit manufacturer manager reported that the accident flight was the pilot/builder’s second flight in the motorglider, the first of which was two days before the accident. A witness at the airport reported seeing the pilot taxi for takeoff and that the engine sounded “a bit rough,” but due to the nature of the small two-stroke engine he was not concerned. The witness reported that the motorglider took off and, when it reached about 100 ft to 150 ft above ground level (agl), the engine sputtered then went silent. Video footage showed that when the motorglider was about midfield, it turned right, then left, then pitched up before the left wing dropped and the motorglider began a near-vertical left rotating descent to ground impact consistent with a low-altitude stall and spin.


Postaccident examination of the motorglider revealed no evidence of any preimpact mechanical malfunctions or failures of the flight controls or airframe that would have precluded normal operation. Examination of the engine revealed that the original airbox had been replaced with an unrestricted cone-type air filter. The main carburetor jet had also been replaced with a smaller jet, which would have resulted in the engine running slightly lean (the builder had reported that he thought the engine had been running too rich). Additionally, a hole was noted in the center of the engine’s single piston. A metallurgical examination of the piston revealed light gray deposits covering portions of the crown surface around the hole. The piston crown had features consistent with pre-ignition damage. This damage was likely the result of an excessively lean mixture due to the unrestricted air intake and smaller main jet. The hole in the piston would have resulted in a total loss of engine power.


The distance from the accident site to the end of the available grass area was about 1,300 ft. The kit manufacturer reported that the motorglider’s typical landing roll was about 200 ft or less. Had the pilot aggressively lowered the nose of the motorglider to maintain airspeed following the loss of engine power, it is likely that he could have avoided the low altitude aerodynamic stall/spin and landed within the remaining available runway.


- Probable Cause: The pilot/builder’s modifications of the motorglider’s engine, which resulted in an excessively lean fuel air mixture, preignition, piston failure, and a subsequent total loss of engine power during the initial climb. Contributing to the outcome was the pilot’s failure to maintain airspeed and his exceedance of the motorglider’s critical angle of attack following the loss of engine power, which resulted in an aerodynamic stall/spin at an altitude too low to recover.

Loss of engine power (total): Mooney M20R Ovation, N13LV, fatal accident occurred on June 25, 2023, near Oak Island-Cape Fear Regional Jetport (SUT/KSUT), Southport, North Carolina



  • Location: Southport, North Carolina 
  • Accident Number: ERA23FA273 
  • Date & Time: June 25, 2023, 16:20 Local 
  • Registration: N13LV Aircraft: Mooney M20R 
  • Aircraft Damage: Destroyed 
  • Defining Event: Loss of engine power (total) 
  • Injuries: 1 Fatal 
  • Flight Conducted Under: Part 91: General aviation - Personal 

On June 25, 2023, about 1620 eastern daylight time, a Mooney M20R, N13LV, was destroyed when it was involved in an accident near Southport, North Carolina. The pilot was fatally injured. The airplane was operated as a Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 personal flight.


The pilot was picking up his airplane following unfinished maintenance. Witnesses reported excessive white exhaust smoke and oil leaking from the airplane onto the ground as the pilot taxied it from the mechanic’s hangar to the runway for takeoff. Shortly after takeoff, the pilot reported an engine failure on the common traffic advisory frequency and that he was returning to the runway; however, the airplane impacted a residential area about 1/2-mile before the runway threshold and a postimpact fire ensued.


The airplane had been in for maintenance for 8 months. The private pilot/owner had requested that the mechanic troubleshoot interior lighting, service the brakes, attach a standby vacuum hose, and repair an exhaust leak. The mechanic could not complete the work as he could not start and run up the engine due to dead batteries. When he inspected the batteries, he realized that they were unairworthy. Specifically, the airplane was designed with a 24-volt electrical system that utilized two 24-volt batteries; however, the mechanic found four 12-volt batteries installed. When the mechanic contacted the pilot about the discrepancy, the pilot instructed him to reinstall the four 12-volt batteries. The mechanic refused, as it would have been an unapproved and unairworthy installation. The pilot then stated that he wanted his airplane back. The mechanic told him that the airplane was unairworthy, as he had not completed repairs on it; he also noted that it was unairworthy on the invoice.


The wreckage came to rest on its right side and oil streaks were noted on the underside of the empennage. The engine came to rest inverted, and the propeller remained attached to the engine. An oil sump accessory port plug was observed loose, with oily blue stained baffling material resting below it. Additionally, the No. 4 connecting rod had protruded through the top of the engine case. A check of the oil dipstick revealed no measurable oil in the engine. The engine likely failed due to oil starvation as the oil leaked from a loose oil sump accessory port plug as a result of uncompleted maintenance work.


- Probable Cause: The pilot’s improper decision to fly a known unairworthy airplane, which resulted in a total loss of engine power due to oil starvation.

https://registry.faa.gov/AircraftInquiry/Search/NNumberResult?nNumberTxt=N13LV

https://data.ntsb.gov/carol-repgen/api/Aviation/ReportMain/GenerateNewestReport/192440/pdf

https://data.ntsb.gov/Docket?ProjectID=192440

Thursday, June 05, 2025

Loss of engine power (total): Commander Aircraft 114TC, N6042E, fatal accident occurred on May 21, 2023, near Naked Lady Ranch Airport (64FA), Palm City, Florida

  • Location: Palm City, Florida 
  • Accident Number: ERA23FA239 
  • Date & Time: May 21, 2023, 15:30 Local 
  • Registration: N6042E 
  • Aircraft: COMMANDER AIRCRAFT CO 114TC 
  • Aircraft Damage: Destroyed 
  • Defining Event: Loss of engine power (total) 
  • Injuries: 1 Fatal 
  • Flight Conducted Under: Part 91: General aviation - Personal
On May 21, 2023, about 1530 eastern daylight time, a Commander 114TC airplane, N6042E, was destroyed when it was involved in an accident near Palm City, Florida. The pilot was fatally injured. The airplane was operated as a Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 personal flight.

An eyewitness observed the accident airplane flying at low altitude before the engine made an unusual noise and stopped producing power, after which the airplane entered a descending turn to the ground. The airplane was mostly consumed by a post-impact fire. The wreckage was located about 700 yards north of an airport runway, and it could not be determined if the airplane was departing or arriving at that airport when the accident occurred. Examination of the engine revealed normal compression, ignition, and fuel system function. Although the airplane’s fuel quantity at the time of the accident could not be determined due to fire damage, no blockages or anomalies were found with the remaining components of the fuel system. Examination of the wreckage confirmed flight control continuity and found no evidence of preimpact mechanical failure.

Toxicological results indicated that the pilot had used a cannabis product; however, without delta-9-THC or the psychoactive metabolite of delta-9-THC detected in blood, it is unlikely that the pilot was experiencing significant impairing acute psychoactive effects of cannabis at the time of the accident.

Although the circumstances of the accident are consistent with a loss of engine power, the reason for the loss of power could not be determined, as postaccident examination did not reveal any evidence of a mechanical malfunction or anomaly. The descending turn before impact as described by the witness was consistent with an aerodynamic stall and loss of control, likely as a result of the pilot’s failure to maintain airspeed following the loss of engine power. 

- Probable Cause: A loss of engine power for undetermined reasons, and the pilot’s subsequent loss of control, which resulted in impact with terrain.

https://data.ntsb.gov/carol-repgen/api/Aviation/ReportMain/GenerateNewestReport/192205/pdf

https://data.ntsb.gov/Docket?ProjectID=192205

Powerplant sys/comp malf/fail: Beechcraft V35 Bonanza, N272S, fatal accident occurred on May 21, 2023, near Rougemont, North Carolina






  • Location: Rougemont, North Carolina 
  • Accident Number: ERA23FA238 
  • Date & Time: May 21, 2023, 11:15 Local 
  • Registration: N272S Aircraft: Beech V35 
  • Aircraft Damage: Destroyed 
  • Defining Event: Powerplant sys/comp malf/fail 
  • Injuries: 1 Fatal 
  • Flight Conducted Under: Part 91: General aviation - Personal

On May 21, 2023, at 1115 eastern daylight time, a Beech V35 airplane, N272S, was destroyed when it was involved in an accident near Rougemont, North Carolina. The pilot was fatally injured. The flight was operated as Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 personal flight.

The pilot was on a long cross-country flight when the airplane’s engine lost power completely. The airplane subsequently impacted terrain in a group of pine trees; a postimpact fire ensued. The cockpit and engine sustained extensive thermal damage. Examination of the engine revealed that the crankcase was breached adjacent to the Nos. 3 and 4 cylinders. Disassembly of the engine revealed damage consistent with oil starvation. Due to the extent of the postimpact fire damage, the source of the oil starvation could not be identified. The maintenance records for the engine were presumed to be onboard the airplane and destroyed by fire.

Postmortem toxicology testing by the FAA Forensic Sciences laboratory detected Delta-9- tetrahydrocannabinol (delta-9 THC) and metabolites in the pilot’s heart blood and urine. Delta9-THC is the primary psychoactive chemical in cannabis, including marijuana, hashish, and other cannabis products. Marijuana is a federal Schedule I controlled substance, and the FAA considers its use by pilots unacceptable, regardless of state laws. The postmortem concentrations of the marijuana metabolites indicate that the pilot had used a cannabis product and may have been experiencing associated impairing effects at the time of the accident. However, the precise timing of his last cannabis use, and whether significant impairment was present, could not be determined from the toxicological evidence alone.

- Probable Cause: A total loss of engine power due to oil starvation. The source of the oil starvation could not be determined.

https://data.ntsb.gov/carol-repgen/api/Aviation/ReportMain/GenerateNewestReport/192203/pdf

https://data.ntsb.gov/Docket?ProjectID=192203

Controlled flight into terr/obj (CFIT): Piper J3C-65 Cub, N21811, fatal accident occurred on August 16, 2024, near Mooresburg, Tennessee



  • Location: Mooresburg, Tennessee
  • Accident Number: ERA24LA346 
  • Date & Time: August 16, 2024, 07:15 Local 
  • Registration: N21811 Aircraft: Piper J3 
  • Aircraft Damage: Substantial 
  • Defining Event: Controlled flight into terr/obj (CFIT) 
  • Injuries: 1 Fatal
  •  Flight Conducted Under: Part 91: General aviation - Personal 

The pilot departed from a private airstrip and overflew his property. The airplane subsequently impacted a barn adjacent to the airstrip. The airplane sustained substantial damage, and the fuselage was mostly consumed by the postimpact fire that ensued. The pilot was fatally injured. An autopsy of the pilot was performed by the William L. Jenkins Forensic Center, Johnson City, Tennessee. The autopsy report listed the cause of death as blunt force injuries and the manner of death as suicide.

- Probable Cause: The pilot’s intentional flight into a building as an act of suicide.

https://data.ntsb.gov/carol-repgen/api/Aviation/ReportMain/GenerateNewestReport/194939/pdf

https://data.ntsb.gov/Docket?ProjectID=194939

Boeing 737-823 (WL), N885NN, accident occurred on March 13, 2025, at Denver International Airport (DEN/KDEN), Denver, Colorado

This is preliminary information, subject to change, and may contain errors. Any errors in this report will be corrected when the final report has been completed.

Aviation Accident Preliminary Report - National Transportation Safety Board

Investigator In Charge (IIC): Lovell, John

Additional Participating Entities:

  • Sam Farmiga; GE/CFM
  • Matt Rigsby; FAA AVP110
  • Kaushik Narayan Ramesh; American Airlines
  • Jay Dorothy; APA Doug Housley; TWU-IAM
  • Andrew Rhinehart; APFA
  • Steve Haggerty; Boeing
  • Dave Cunningham; Denver Airport
  • Frederic Walbrou; BEA
  • Hannu Melaranta; EASA
  • Philippe Fouchard; Safran Aircraft Engines
https://registry.faa.gov/AircraftInquiry/Search/NNumberResult?nNumberTxt=N885NN

https://data.ntsb.gov/carol-repgen/api/Aviation/ReportMain/GenerateNewestReport/199853/pdf
  • Location: Denver, CO 
  • Accident Number: DCA25FA159 
  • Date & Time: March 13, 2025, 17:59 Local 
  • Registration: N885NN 
  • Aircraft: Boeing 737-823 
  • Injuries: 12 Minor, 166 None 
  • Flight Conducted Under: Part 121: Air carrier - Scheduled

On March 13, 2025, about 1759 mountain daylight time, American Airlines flight 1006, Boeing 737-823, N885NN, experienced engine vibrations during takeoff from Colorado Springs Airport (COS), Colorado Springs, Colorado. The flight crew continued the takeoff, then diverted to and landed at Denver International Airport (DEN), Denver, Colorado. After landing, the flight crew taxied to their assigned gate and both engines were shutdown. After shutdown, a fire ensued in the area of the No. 2 (right) engine and the passengers and crew evacuated the airplane.


The fire was extinguished within 1 minute by gate ramp personnel, prior to the arrival of the DEN aircraft fire fighting and rescue (ARFF). Of the three trucks that arrived, one truck, positioned toward the right side of the airplane sprayed water on the right aft fuselage area and right inboard wing “hot spots” (areas indicated by their infrared heat sensors). 


Video provided by DEN airport operations showed a trail of fluid leaking from under the right engine nacelle as the airplane taxied into the gate.


The flight was operated under the provisions of Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 121 as a scheduled domestic passenger flight from COS to Dallas Fort Worth International Airport (DFW). There were 2 flight crew, 4 cabin crew and 172 passengers on board. Twelve passengers received minor injuries. The airplane received substantial damage. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed at the time of the accident.


The first officer (FO) was the pilot flying, and the captain was the pilot monitoring. According to the flight crew, during takeoff and just before V1 there was an EGT over-temp for the No. 2 engine. After gear and flaps were retracted, the power was slightly reduced on the No. 2 engine and the EGT over-temp subsided to within limits.


During climbout, the captain noted high engine vibration indications for the right engine (No. 2). The captain called for the High Engine Vibration checklist and the FO continued to fly the airplane. The flight crew discussed the need to divert and contacted American Airlines dispatch. It was determined that DEN would be the most reasonable airport to divert to. The crew climbed to 16,000 feet msl, which was the highest altitude reached for the flight.


The captain informed the passengers and the flight attendants that the flight was diverting to DEN. Approach and landing were normal, and it took about five minutes to taxi to the gate.  Soon after arriving at the gate, flight attendants heard passengers yelling “fire” and “smoke” and saw smoke start to the fill the cabin. One of the flight attendants tried calling the flight crew but did not get an answer. Another flight attendant knocked on the cockpit door to alert the flight crew of the fire outside the airplane and smoke in the cabin. In the meantime, passengers got up and were coming to the flight attendants wanting to get off the airplane. The flight attendants conducted their assessments and initiated an evacuation.


Passengers used the L1 door, both left overwing window exits, and the R2 door for egress. The passengers who used the L1 door deplaned using the jetway bridge. After the evacuation, the L2 door was observed cracked open, with maintenance subsequently discovering the escape slide jammed in the door, preventing its operation. The R2 evacuation slide deployed automatically when the R2 door was opened.


The passengers who used the left overwing window exits were evacuated off the wing by a combination of ground vehicles, ladders that were available in the gate area, and a belt loader. Post event examination found the flaps had remained at zero.


Investigation

The airplane was towed to a local maintenance hangar for examination. The airplane exhibited heat/smoke/burn indications near the right engine nacelle, right wing, right side of the fuselage aft of the wing, the right main landing gear, and the right main landing gear wheel well (see figure 1).

The on-scene engine examination found the right engine nacelle was intact; however, there was dark streaking which was consistent with in-flight streamlines and the aft and bottom of the nacelle was sooted and thermally distressed, consistent with a ground fire (see figure 2).

The airplane was powered by two CFM56-7B turbofan engines. The right engine was examined and all the engine fan blades were present, but one fan blade platform was fractured. In addition, the lockwire of a fuel fitting on the variable stator vane (VSV) was loose and installed in the incorrect direction. The VSV actuator rod end was incorrectly fastened and secured to the VSV actuator allowing fuel to leak from the fitting. The VSV rod end muscle line was fractured in the weld, and the 6 o’clock seal drain line of the inboard thrust reverser half was blocked with sealant above the lower bifurcation fire seal and in the exit tube.


The L2 slide was found removed from its bustle and on the floor of the L2 passageway with its safety pin installed. The slide pack was inspected and the bannis latch was found to move freely. There were some dark scuffs on the outboard side of the pack, and there was a tear on the underside of the girt fabric towards the center.


NTSB launched on this event and operations, powerplants, airworthiness, and survival factors groups were formed on-scene. The cockpit voice recorder (CVR) and the flight data recorder (FDR) were sent to the recorders lab at NTSB headquarters for download and audition. Intelligible CVR audio began while the aircraft was climbing from 15,000 to 16,000 ft and the crew was performing the Engine High Vibration checklist. The cockpit area microphone (CAM) channel of the CVR recorded an hour of audio prior to this time, however audio from the CAM was unintelligible for the full duration of the recording.


The FDR was in good condition and the data were extracted normally from the recorder. The FDR recording contained approximately 54 hours of data with over 1,000 parameters recorded. The event flight was the last flight of the recording, and its duration was approximately 1 hour.


Maintenance records for the right engine were reviewed. The damaged fan blade platform, rod end manifold, and the aft exhaust plug were retained for further examination.


The L2 slide was shipped to the manufacturer for a detailed inspection and its maintenance log will be reviewed. 


Parties to the investigation are American Airlines, General Electric (GE) Aerospace, Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), The Boeing Company (Boeing), Allied Pilots Association (APA), Transport Workers Union - International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers (TWU-IAM), Association of Professional Flight Attendants (APFA), and Denver Airport.  In accordance with the provisions of Annex 13 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation, the Bureau d’Enquetes et d’Analyses pour la securite de l’aviation civile (BEA) of France appointed an Accredited Representative since the CFM International engine is a joint venture between GE Aerospace and Safran Aircraft Engines. Safran Aircraft Engines and European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) are technical advisors to BEA, as provided by Annex 13. 


The investigation continues.